Lawmakers in Missouri have proposed a bill that will require parents to declare the weapons they keep at home to the school their child/children attend. Failure to comply will result in a fine. If your child uses a gun to harm or kill someone, parents will be guilty of a class D felony, and pay a fine ten times higher.
Not only is this an obvious money-making racket by lawmakers, like so many newly proposed anti-gun laws across the nation, but we can also see such a law creating an even more dangerous situation. As tragic as the school shooting in Connecticut was, it still remains a quite isolated incident that was not even perpetrated by a student.
A person is far more likely to he hurt or killed in an everyday sort of crime, such as a robbery or home invasion, that will never garner national media attention. And therefore, it is a much more prudent to maintain some level of secrecy surrounding one's gun ownership, lest they or their home be targeted by criminals. Those criminals may be intent on taking the guns themselves or at the very least, will come prepared to do you harm, knowing now that you are armed and how you are armed. This danger is the very basis of concealed weapons, and the permitting of carrying concealed weapons.
In New York State, gun owners suddenly became acutely aware of such information falling into the wrong hands, when the irresponsible rag Journal News decided to publish the names and addresses of legally permitted gun owners in several counties. They even went so far as to create an interactive web-page with the information. They finally took the page down when gun owners homes were targeted by robbers and burglars.
But being the underdog in a crime scenario is not the only threat to parents who must declare their guns to a school. Such information could be used in any number of discriminatory ways, against a student and/or the parents especially.
At the end of the day, it's no one's damn business whether or not you have a gun in your home, if you are a law abiding citizen protected by the Second Amendment.
The government’s dietary recommendations also contribute to the obesity problem.
“The
USDA has two mandates, and they are conflicting,” Bowden maintained.
“The first is to get the people of the United States good information
about nutrition. The second mandate is to build markets and to build
business for the agricultural industry. Well, if you’re putting out
crap, and you’ve got to build markets for that, you can’t very well tell
the people that you’re supposed to be informing that this is crap.”
Political influence has plagued the Department of Agriculture’s dietary advice for well over a century. In his book Bully Boy: The Truth About Theodore Roosevelt’s Legacy,
Jim Powell notes that Harvey Washington Wiley, the chief chemist at the
USDA’s Bureau of Chemistry from 1882 to 1912, “encouraged Americans to
consume more sugar, which he considered the hallmark of an advanced
civilization. ‘Childhood without candy,’ he remarked, ‘would be Heaven
without harps.’” Wiley, as it happens, was tight with the sugar
industry. He lobbied for high sugar tariffs, and sugar producers helped
protect him from political enemies.
The food pyramid, which the
USDA introduced in 1992, was greatly influenced by politics. The pyramid
recommended six to 11 servings of grains daily — more than any other
food group, and more than vegetables and fruits combined.
“While the government has stood by this regimen for 11 years,” the Wall Street Journal
reported in 2002, “some critics say it’s no coincidence that the number
of overweight Americans has risen 61% since the pyramid was introduced —
and almost instantaneously appeared on the sides of pasta boxes, bread
wrappers and packages of other food products in the pyramid’s
six-to-11-servings category.”
At that time the USDA’s dietary
guidelines were up for review, “an exercise that attracts not only
critics from the world of medicine but industry lobbyists and those
promoting the virtues of various food groups and diets,” the Journal
observed. The lobbying should not be surprising given that, as the same
newspaper reported in 2004, “the tiniest change to the guidelines or
pyramid can swing food companies’ sales by millions of dollars.”
“Every aisle of the supermarket has a lobbyist in town,” food-industry consultant Jeff Nedelman told the Journal.
Some
industry groups, such as the National Dairy Council, sought increases
in the number of recommended servings of their products. Others sought
merely to retain their prominence in the pyramid: “There is no doubt
that the Food Guide Pyramid in 1992 was a big boost to the baking
industry,” Sara Lee Corp. baking division spokesman Matt Hall told the
paper.
The resulting guidelines were anything but impartial and scientific.
In
2011, the USDA replaced the food pyramid with MyPlate. Most pyramid
critics agree that the new guide is an improvement over the old one.
Fruits and vegetables now occupy a larger part of the recommended diet,
though grains still constitute a sizable portion of it, and dairy — not
necessarily harmful but certainly not essential — remains in the
recommendations, no doubt reflecting continued industry pressure. And
whereas the food pyramid suggested using fats “sparingly,” MyPlate fails
to address the issue at all, despite research showing that some fats
are actually beneficial.
Now, after all these years of
subsidizing and recommending poor diets, the government, led by the UN,
wants people to trust it to help them shrink their waistlines. Yet who
doubts that, just as in the past, policies implemented in the future
will not be governed solely by disinterested scientists but also by
lobbyists, politicians beholden to special interests, and researchers
pushing an agenda?
Still, even if disinterested individuals were given a free hand to solve the obesity dilemma, what, exactly, would they do?
“If
the president called and said, ‘You’re going to be an advisor [on
obesity]. Fix it any way that you want,’ I would just run from the room
screaming because I wouldn’t even know where to start,” Bowden said.
While
diet and exercise certainly play a role, “there are enormous genetic,
metabolic, biochemical, [and] environmental factors that work together
in some manner, shape, or form that is virtually impossible to study
because you’ve got too many factors,” he averred. “I have talked to
obesity researchers who have said, ‘We’ve been studying this stuff for
20 years, and we still do not understand it.’”
This constitutes
yet another parallel between “global warming” and the obesity “crisis.”
No one doubts that the Earth’s climate has changed over time — not just
seasonally but over centuries and millennia — and that even now it is
changing in observable ways. Likewise, everyone can see with his own
eyes — or bathroom scale — that humans are becoming heavier by the day.
In both cases, neither the underlying causes of the changes nor their
ultimate repercussions are fully understood, but the solutions proposed
by those claiming to know the answers are the same: global governance; a
larger, more intrusive state; and a surrender of our liberties.
The start-up robot firm Momentum Machines is one. Funded by San
Francisco's Lemnos Labs, it has developed a robot designed to take the
place of humans in burger restaurants. Its creators believe their
patty-flipping Alpha robot could save the fast-food industry in the
United States about US$9 billion (Dh33.05bn) a year. Designed to
entirely replace two to three full-time kitchen staff, it can grill a
beef patty, layer it with lettuce, tomatoes, pickles and onions, put it
in a bun, and wrap it up to go - no less than 360 times an hour.
Momentum believes kitchen robots are not only more cost-effective than
human staff, they are also more hygienic.
Silicon Valley technology industry watchers believe businesses will be early adopters of 21st-Century robotics technology.
"Like
PCs, we'll likely see the first wave in business because it can handle
the costs more readily and then move to the high end of the consumer
market," says the Rob Enderle, the principal analyst at the Enderle
Group, based in Silicon Valley.
He adds the robotics industry is
at about the same early stage in its evolution as the personal computing
industry was in the 1980s but believes it will mature more quickly.
Genetically screening our offspring to make them better people is
just “responsible parenting”, claims an eminent Oxford academic, The Telegraph reports.
Professor Julian Savulescu,
editor-in-chief of the Journal of Medical Ethics, said that creating
so-called designer babies could be considered a “moral obligation” as it
makes them grow up into “ethically better children”, this based on a
few genetic links to ‘personality disorders’.
He said that we should actively give parents the choice to screen out
personality flaws in their children as it meant they were then less
likely to “harm themselves and others”.
I like a good conspiracy theory as much as the next guy living in his Mom's basement, but the so called "Moon landing hoax" really doesn't have me at all convinced. It has been a popular conspiracy theory for some time now, getting a fair amount of play even in the mainstream media. I have to admit, that I dug into it for a time looking through the photos, the footage, the documents. I read the arguments and engaged in the debates on conspiracy forums. I didn't make up my mind ahead of time, so I went back and forth almost believing and then almost not believing men ever landed on the Moon.
Today, I have settled it enough in my own mind to close the discussion, unless of course, some new ground-breaking bit of evidence were to come forth. My humble opinion is that if we can build an atomic bomb, put it on the tip of a missile and fly it to Moscow, then I am pretty sure we could land some men on the Moon. So if the Moon landing was a hoax, the Cold War probably was too. But that's a different conspiracy theory.
In the meantime though, and in the interest of fair play, I want to give you a look at this great article I read a number of years ago now, that really unsettled me. It's pretty convincing that the moon landing might very well have been hoaxed largely in part by one Stanley Kubrick, famous film maker. So have a read, and then watch the great video afterwards which provides the wonderful counterpoint and should close the door on this conspiracy theory.
Or just go ahead and skip the mumbo jumbo for now and jump on down to the video.
Secret of The Shining: Or How Faking the Moon Landins Almost Cost Stanley Kubrick His Marriage and His Life
The Shining is surely
Stanley Kubrick's
most misunderstood masterpiece.
I use the word 'masterpiece' guardedly because I have never really
thought that The Shining was a very good film.
At the time, in 1980 when I first saw it, I didn't like it at all.
The way that Kubrick threw out so much of Stephen King's great
source material and replaced it with a lot of things that just
didn't seem to make any sense, really bothered me.
Hopefully, before I am finished with this essay, the reader will see
it is only when Kubrick dramatically alters the script from Stephen
King's novel that we can begin to understand what Stanley Kubrick is
trying to tell us in his version of The Shining.
It should be understood from the beginning that The Shining is
Stanley Kubrick's most personal film (outside of, possibly, Eyes
Wide Shut). Before we are done here it will be easy to see that
Kubrick was only using Stephen King's novel as a launching pad
(excuse the pun) to be able to tell a completely different story
under the guise of making a film based on a best-selling novel.
He
did this for a very important reason - mainly to save his life.
Let's not get too far ahead of ourselves.
In fact, let's start at the beginning.
There are two main characters in the film, Jack Torrance (played by
Jack Nicholson) and his son Danny (played by Danny Lloyd).
It is important to understand here that Jack and Danny are two
aspects of Stanley Kubrick himself. Jack is the practical, pragmatic
guy who wants to be a great artist. And he is, apparently, willing
to do anything to accomplish his goal of being an artist (writer).
Jack, like Stanley has black hair, he is idiosyncratic and even
smokes the same cigarettes as Stanley (Marlboro).
Danny is the other side of the great director. He is the child-like
Kubrick. It is Danny who is actually the real artist.
The Danny side of Kubrick side is psychic, youthful and sees things
that no one else sees. Danny also has a tendency to tell people
things that should be kept quiet.
The first part of the The Shining is probably the longest, most
boring, 58 minutes in Kubrick's career.
The opening of the film takes place with us witnessing Stanley's
pragmatic side, Jack, cutting a deal with the Manager of the
Overlook Hotel.
The deal between Jack and the Manager of the Overlook is that Jack
can write (that is - create) all that he wants as long as he "takes
care" of The Overlook.
One other important point is that the Manager of The Overlook tells
Jack that the previous caretaker went crazy from the stress of the
job and killed his wife and two girls.
Jack says he is "intrigued" but takes the deal anyway.
The Manager of the Overlook Hotel is wearing red, white and blue.
Jack's wife Wendy (played by Shelly Duval) and his son Danny also
wear red, white and blue for almost the entire first hour of the
film.
In this symbolic interpretation the Overlook Hotel is AMERICA. It
was built, just like the Manager says, on the graves of Indians.
Even when walking on the floor of the Overlook Hotel, one finds
oneself trampling over various Native American symbols.
The Overlook Hotel itself is America.
Like America, the Overlook Hotel is new and shiny. It is
ostentatious, corny and architecturally boring.
As the Manager tells
Wendy,
"All of the best people stayed here".
But there is something very deep happening. Kubrick brushed
shoulders with
the elite of the world. He knows what is going on.
We have to begin to understand Kubrick's story from his use of
symbols. As I like to say: if a picture is worth a thousand words,
then a symbol is worth a thousand pictures. For it will be through
the use of symbol that the real story of The Shining can be
revealed.
The Manager of the Overlook, while interviewing Jack, has an
American Eagle right behind his head.
It is as if "The Eagle" is the
power behind the Manager.
Not only is the Eagle the symbol of America but it should be noted
that the Lunar Lander of the Apollo 11 mission was called "The
Eagle".
To the Manager's right on the desk is an American flag.
Symbolically the Manager (played by Barry Nelson) is the face of the
government of the United States. Jack has cut this deal with the
government to be the "caretaker" of the Hotel.
The Manager tells Jack that his main job is to prevent the Overlook
Hotel (America) from appearing like it is decaying. The Manager
reiterates that this is Jack's primary responsibility.
On their first day in the Hotel, Danny has a vision of the previous
caretaker's daughters, and he sees that they are twins. The previous
caretaker's daughters were not twins in the Stephen King novel. This
discrepancy between the book and the film will grow in importance as
we continue.
Jack, Danny and Wendy also meet Dick Halorann who is the cook for
the Overlook. He befriends Danny and it is through him that Danny
discovers that he is not alone when it comes to psychic ability.
Dick warns Danny to stay away from Room 237.
Jack, Wendy and Danny have now fully moved into the Hotel. There is
a long cold winter ahead of them. At first Jack loves the hotel but
he is having problems with his writing. Also he cannot sleep.
Meanwhile Wendy and Danny are having fun.
Jack is not writing. Instead he is throwing a tennis ball at the
wall in the room where his typewriter sits.
On the wall, which is
being struck by the tennis ball, is a Native American artistic motif
that looks suspiciously like a group of rockets about to be
launched.
Jack throwing the
ball at the rocket/arrows on the wall.
Apollo was the god of Archery. Jack is playing ball with Apollo's
arrows
Finally the ball bounces away from Jack and disappears into the
darkness of the hotel.
Jack walks over and looks down at the model
of the maze. He sees Wendy and Danny caught in the middle of the
maze, totally unaware of the nature of the deal that he has cut with
the Overlook.
A cold winter storm has now blown over the Hotel.
The oncoming storm
is a symbol of the Cold War between Russia and the United States. Of
course the Cold War is also one of the driving forces for the entire
reason for faking the moon landings. It was necessary to hide the
advanced U.S. saucer technology from the Soviet Union.
We were
living in a very dangerous world and it was shrewd to hide our
advanced technology from the Russians. This is the reason for the
bears that are seen all over The Shining.
The Russian Bear, and its
competition for the race to the Moon, was a driving force behind
having to fake the Apollo Moon landings.
Jack, his family, and the Overlook Hotel, are trapped in the Cold,
just as America was trapped in the Cold War with Russia.
The stuffed
bears, seen through out the film, are the Soviet Empire's symbol.
Symbolically the Bears seen through the film are also the
representation of the pressure that the Russians put on the USA to
get to the Moon. They had to fake the moon landings and cover up
the
real truth behind the flying saucer craft and machinery that the US
government actually has created and employed since World War Two.
Danny is riding his bike through the halls of The Overlook when he
comes upon the twin daughters of the previous caretaker.
They stare
at Danny and together they say:
"Come play with us Danny. Forever
and ever."
Danny turns and wheels it out of there.
At this point in the film we graphically discover the nature of the
deal that Jack really cut with the Manager of the Overlook:
It is the most crucial scene in the film. Danny is in a hallway
playing with his trucks. Suddenly, out of nowhere, The Project, the
Overlook Hotel, rolls the tennis ball, from nowhere, at him.
It is a
gesture that says:
"Wanna play?"
It is here that we discover what
happened to Jack's tennis ball that was previously swallowed up by
the darkness of the Overlook.
We also discover what game it is that
the twin daughters of the previous caretaker were inviting Danny to
play.
Mystified by where the ball came from, Danny stands up, and the
audience finally sees what the nature of the Project really is
about:
As Danny stands up, the answer is revealed in an instant. Danny is
wearing a sweater with a crudely sewn rocket pictured on the front.
On the rocket clearly seen on Danny's sweater are the words: APOLLO
11.
The audience watching the film literally sees the launch of Apollo
11, right before their eyes, as Danny rises from the floor. It isn't
the real launch of Apollo 11, it is, of course, the symbolic
launching of Apollo 11. In other words - it isn't real.
What happens next is crucial to understanding everything else that
happens in the film.
Danny, bewildered, walks down the hallway. He sees that Room 237 -
the room that Halorann warned him about - has a key in the lock and
the door is wide open.
It is important to note that the room in question was numbered
217
in the Stephen King version of The Shining. For unknown reason's
Kubrick changed it to 237.
Those unknown reasons are about to be come known.
Danny is literally carrying a symbolic Apollo 11, on his body, via
the sweater, to the Moon as he walks over to room 237.
Why do I
think this?
Because the average distance from the Earth to the Moon is 237,000
miles.
The real truth is that this movie is really about the deal that
Stanley Kubrick made with the Manager of the Overlook Hotel
(America). This deal was to get Kubrick to re-create, in other
words, to fake, the Apollo 11 Moon landing.
Danny represents the artistic side of Kubrick. Because of the
complexity of the artistic realization of the manner in which the
lunar landings needed to appear, Kubrick needed to trust his
artistic side.
Room 237 represents the fake lunar set that Stanley had to create to
make the lunar landings appear factual. But really, on this set, and
in this room, nothing is real.
As the film will soon reveal, Room 237 has to be lied about. It
cannot be understood at all… ever. Nothing real ever happens in room 237.
For a moment, in the film, it looks like Danny is actually going to
enter Room 237. But we are never sure.
In the next scene Jack has a bad dream while he is working. He tells
Wendy that in his dream he has killed Wendy and Danny.
Meanwhile Danny enters the scene and it is obvious that some
mysterious force has physically hurt Danny.
This mysterious force
has also torn his Apollo 11 sweater.
Wendy, horrified, thinks that Jack did it.
In a way she is right because Danny got hurt because of the deal
that Jack cut.
Frustrated, Jack goes to the bar located in the Gold Room. Obviously
stressed, Jack whispers to no one that he would sell his soul for a
drink.
It is then that Jack meets the real manager of the Overlook Hotel. A
mysterious man suddenly appears behind the bar.
His name is Lloyd
and he is the bartender of the Overlook Hotel.
Clearly Stanley Kubrick shows Lloyd in a Satanic light.
Lloyd seduces Jack with a drink.
Jack has sold his soul to the Project, to being the caretaker of the
Overlook.
Jack and Lloyd's conversation is interrupted by Wendy's entrance.
Lloyd and Jack's glass of Scotch suddenly disappear. Wendy tells
Jack that someone else is in the hotel.
Jack then goes to Room 237 and sees the manifestation of a young
woman into an old woman.
Because Room 237 is, symbolically, the Lunar Set for Apollo 11, Jack
has to lie to Wendy about what is going on in the room. He tells her
that nothing is going on in Room 237. It is apparent that Danny must
have hurt himself.
It is true, Danny did get hurt because of Jack. Danny is the side of
Stanley that knew of Stanley's secret project. Somehow he got into a
situation where they (The Overlook Hotel - America) hurt him.
After this Jack begins to go to hell physically.
He is growing an
unkempt beard and is not combing his hair - two things that Stanley
Kubrick was known for doing, or not doing, himself.
Now Jack (Nicholson) is looking a lot like Stanley Kubrick.
Especially as he began to appear under the stress of the twin
productions going on at once:
It should also be noted that Jack and
Stanley are about the same age and they have the same hair color.
Early
2001 - A Space Odysey Production photos show a youthful and
un-bearded Kubrick with combed hair, looking quite handsome. But
photos taken four years later - near the end of the production of
2001: A Space Odyssey - show that Kubrick was a physical wreck. The
de-evolution of Stanley Kubrick's appearance during the production
of 2001: A Space Odyssey is disturbingly close to Jack Torrance's
(Jack Nicholson's) appearance in The Shining.
Despite his disheveled appearance Jack has started writing again.
Wendy, (who is really supposed to be Kubrick's wife Christina),
wants to read the book that Jack is working so furiously on. She
asks to see what he is writing. Jack is surprised by her entrance
into the room where he does his writing. Angrily he rejects her. He
tells her to stay out of the room where he is writing.
It is clear that Wendy, Kubrick's wife, is not allowed to know
anything about the Project.
But what is this book that Jack is writing?
Wendy soon finds out what is in the book that Jack is writing. It is
then that we get the clincher that proves that this essay is the
correct interpretation of Kubrick's The Shining.
Wendy sneaks into Jack's writing room. Slowly she begins to read the
book that Jack has been working on.
This scene is totally original to the movie. It is not in the King
novel. Although it is mildly terrifying, it is not that horrific.
Yet it is the centerpiece of the film and arguably the scariest
scene in the movie.
Why?
Because every single one of the hundreds of pages that Jack has been
furiously writing is a variation of only one sentence:
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy".
Incredibly every page has this exact sentence.
And it is written
over and over.
Truly it is scary enough to think that Jack has just
been sitting there, day after day, writing the same sentence, over
and over. Wendy face reveals her fear over the discovery.
What does it all mean?
May I humbly suggest that the word "All" in this repeated sentence
actually stands for "A11" that is: "A-One-One", or Apollo 11?
"A11 work and no play makes Jack a dull boy."
May I suggest that the nickname, or the
code name, for the faking of
the Apollo Moon Missions was A11?
Accepting that this is true we can see what Stanley is really
telling us:
'"Apollo 11 work and no play makes Jack (Kubrick) a dull boy."
If you think that I am stretching things here I would like to point
out the patch that NASA had created to symbolize the Apollo program:
There are other 'A's' in the film also.
The Overlook Hotel has
several A's' built into its construction when viewed from the
outside:
Stanley has used these A's before also.
Here is the cover of A
Clockwork Orange with Alex menacingly coming out of the 'A' with his
all-seeing-eye cufflink:
It is clear from the evidence presented in the film that Kubrick's
wife (Shelly Duval) had discovered that he (Stanley Kubrick) had
made a secret deal with the Manager of the Overlook, (i.e.) with the
rulers of the USA.
Shelly Duval (Christina Kubrick) also discovered that what she
thought was one thing actually turned out to be another. What Mrs.
Kubrick discovered was that - instead of making a science fiction
film called 2001: A Space Odyssey - her husband was really working
to create the fake Apollo moon landings.
At this point the film finally gets really interesting. Frightened
by this revelation Wendy (Stanley's wife) wants Jack (Stanley) to
quit the Project.
Jack (Stanley) angrily replies:
"That is so typical of you! … I've
made an agreement … I have obligations to my employers!"
Danny uses The Shining to contact Dick Halorann in Florida (which I
might add is where Apollo 11 was launched). Dick laboriously travels
from Florida to Colorado.
In another abrupt break with the novel, Jack Torrance kills Halorann
as soon as he arrives at the Overlook (so much for Halorann's
psychic abilities!)
While I think this scene is very disturbing and I doubt if I can
ever prove this but I think Stanley Kubrick is telling us something
very definite with this alteration to the King novel.
I believe that the naïve side of him, represented by Danny, told
someone that he, Kubrick, was faking the Apollo missions.
He may
even have told this person that he was faking the lunar landings for
NASA while also appearing to produce
the film 2001: A Space Odyssey. Hallorin is the representation of the person that Kubrick mistakenly
revealed this most secret of all information. Because of that,
Hallorin, or the person who Stanley told, had to die.
The secret must remain safe.
This also explains why Kubrick had to
hide all of this crucial information inside the construct of the
King novel. Kubrick wanted the story to get out, but he was also
afraid for his life. Kubrick had to fake the making of the Stephen
King novel so that he could reveal that he was involved in the
faking the moon landings!
The truth is that The Shining is the story of how Stanley Kubrick
cut a deal with the U.S. Government to fake the Apollo moon
landings.
It is also the story of how Kubrick may have accidentally told
someone what he had done and how that person had to be killed. The Shining is also the story of how faking the Apollo moon landings
almost sacrificed his relationship with his wife.
Finally it is the story of how Stanley Kubrick barely escaped alive
to create another day.
The Shining is the story of how a part of Stanley Kubrick was killed
by the agreement that he made with the U. S. government to become
the "caretaker" of The Project called A11 or Apollo 11.
It is also the story of the history of NASA.
This explains why the previous "caretaker" was so pressured and
stressed that he had to kill his TWIN daughters.
Why?
Because the previous NASA missions before Apollo were named Gemini!
There is much more in this film than can be discussed here. I am
sure that much more will be discovered.
I present this tidbit of an interpretation to show not only that
Stanley Kubrick directed the Apollo moon landings but also to ask
NASA to release all of Kubrick's Apollo moon landing footage in
their original, glorious 70 mm film.
It is time to shed the lies. But also it is time for the world to
view, uncensored, Stanley Kubrick's greatest unknown masterpiece. I
ask NASA to release all of the footage directed by Kubrick for the
faked Apollo landings.
May I also suggest that NASA use the millions of dollars made from
this surely successful movie release to fund another mission to the
moon?
I mean it has only been 35 years!
Also - may I suggest a title for this new Kubrick film?
How about:
Never A Straight Answer? (NASA)
The books in Jack’s apartment reflect the dual nature of Stanley
Kubrick.
The book on top is entitled “The Wise Child” represented in
the film by Danny
and the book below is entitled “The Manipulator”
which is represented by Jack.
Seven Apollo missions went to the moon, but only six landed.
China slams ‘war-addicted’ US
-
[image: Preview] The Chinese defense ministry has accused the Pentagon of
fabricating false narratives in its latest report on Beijing’s military
threat
R...
Is OpenAI’s o3 Model AGI?
-
I doubt it’s actually AGI, but it looks impressive. If it’s any
consolation, they let it use a very nontrivial amount of compute to pull
this off. If/when ...
This feed has moved and will be deleted soon. Please update your
subscription now.
-
The publisher is using a new address for their RSS feed. Please update your
feed reader to use this new URL:
*http://www.alternet.org/home/feed*
The Hemp Industry / Staying Positive
-
Air Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020
Doug Fine discussed the many amazing properties of hemp. Followed by Eldon
Taylor on staying positive in the COVID-19 era.
The Alzheimer’s Drug that Might Unlock Your Dreams
-
As excited as I get about the potentiality of psychedelic drugs, I get far
more amped about pushing the boundaries of dreams as I’m not sure there are
an...
DOJ Stumbles at Hearing on Detaining Immigrants
-
Criticizing an attorney for the government for arguing issues he never
raised in briefing, the First Circuit seemed likely at a hearing Wednesday
to u...
Mom Has Stacked Dinner Party Roster
-
GOLDEN, CO—Their eyes widening in amazement as the 43-year-old rattled off
the names of heavy hitter after heavy hitter, impressed members of the
Dreesh...
