The following is an episode of Jesse Ventura's television show Conspiracy Theory. This episode only aired once before it was pulled from circulation on television. The episode is repeatedly scrubbed off of YouTube. It is presented here as one of the few places where you can still see it.
The topic of the episode are the so-called "FEMA Camps" and government "fusion centers."
Shade exposes the true power structure embedded in our global reality,
showing the true controllers their plans to Geo-engineer our planet and
control the populace.
The assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Texas on November 22, 1963 is the subject of what is probably the single most talked about conspiracy-theory in American history. The official story still stands that he was murdered by lone-gunman Lee Harvey Oswald, but today even folks who will roll their eyes at most discussion of conspiracy-theory topics would probably admit that even they do not buy that story entirely. Although there are actually many varying and interlacing theories surrounding the death of the popular American President, one theory seems to have gained some real traction in the past decade or so, culminating now with this bombshell revelation...
Explosive Jackie O tapes 'reveal how she believed Lyndon B Johnson killed JFK and had affair with movie star'
She will allegedly reveal affair with actor William Holden
Believed Vice-President Johnson was behind husband's assassination
Jackie Onassis believed that Lyndon B Johnson and a cabal of Texas tycoons were involved in the assassination of her husband John F Kennedy, ‘explosive’ recordings are set to reveal.
The secret tapes will show that the former first lady felt that her husband’s successor was at the heart of the plot to murder him.
She became convinced that the then vice president, along with businessmen in the South, had orchestrated the Dallas shooting, with gunman Lee Harvey Oswald – long claimed to have been a lone assassin – merely part of a much larger conspiracy.
Texas-born Mr Johnson, who served as the state’s governor and senator, completed Mr Kennedy’s term and went on to be elected president in his own right.
The tapes were recorded with leading historian Arthur Schlesinger Jnr within months of the assassination on November 22, 1963, and had been sealed in a vault at the Kennedy Library in Boston.
This is a general description of the theory that JFK's vice-President Lyndon B. Johnson was behind the assassination, taken from a Wikipedia article on the subject:
In 2003, researcher Barr McClellan published the book, Blood, Money & Power: How L.B.J. Killed J.F.K..[100] McClellan claims that Lyndon Johnson, motivated by the fear of being dropped from the Kennedy ticket in 1964 and the need to cover up various scandals, masterminded Kennedy's assassination with the help of his friend attorney Edwardo Clark. The book suggests that a smudged partial fingerprint from the sniper's nest likely belonged to Johnson's associate Malcolm "Mac" Wallace, and that Mac Wallace was therefore the assassin. The book further claims that the killing of Kennedy was paid for by oil magnates including Clint Murchison and H. L. Hunt. McClellan's book subsequently became the subject of an episode of Nigel Turner's ongoing documentary television series, The Men Who Killed Kennedy. The episode, entitled "The Guilty Men", drew widespread condemnation from both the Johnson family and President Johnson's former aides following its airing on The History Channel, which subsequently agreed not to air the episode in the future.[101]
Madeleine D. Brown, who was an alleged mistress of Johnson, has also implicated him in a conspiracy to kill Kennedy. In 1997, Brown alleged that Johnson, along with H. L. Hunt, had begun planning Kennedy's demise as early as 1960. Brown claimed that by its fruition in 1963 the conspiracy involved dozens of persons including the leadership of the FBI and the Mafia as well as well-known politicians and journalists.[102] In the documentary The Men Who Killed Kennedy, Brown and a former employee of Clint Murchison both placed J. Edgar Hoover and Johnson at a dinner at Murchison's mansion shortly before the assassination. Brown claimed in the documentary that Johnson told her after the party that the Kennedys "will never embarrass me again".[citation needed] Similar suspicions are voiced by a number of LBJ associates, including Brown, in their own words in the 2006 documentary Evidence of Revision.[citation needed]
Below here are a few videos with descriptions related to the theory that LBJ was behind the assassination:
The night before the Kennedy assassination, Lyndon Baines Johnson met with Dallas tycoons, FBI moguls and organized crime kingpins - emerging from the conference to tell his mistress Madeleine Duncan Brown that "those SOB's" would never embarrass him again. It's a jaw-dropping deposition and it's the biggest JFK smoking gun there is - despite the fact that it has received little media attention.
You can see her full 82-minute interview here at this link:
E. Howard Hunt, infamous "Watergate Plumber," provides his "deathbed confession" of his participation in the CIA and "Group 40" conspiracy, and names names!
More video of Mr. Hunt are also available there at YouTube.
Referring to Nixon`s escalation of the bombing campaign in the Vietnam War. Relates anecdote of George E Christian LBJ`s Press Secretary remark about LBJ`s involvement in the JFK assassination. Taken from the famous David Frost interview.
These revelations are certainly stunning, and chilling enough in their own right, but I don't think most of what is talked about above really goes far enough to explain the true depth of the conspiracy or the motivations behind it. There have always been men in government, covetous of power and fame, yet we are not plagued with assassinations of our political leaders here in the U.S. Certainly not so literally and brazenly anyhow. Nonetheless, what we have seen in most of the material above might lead us to conclude that an American President was murdered simply because he had a disgruntled troll for a vice-President.
This is really not much more than a dressed up "lone gunman" theory again though. Even though others did assist and conspire in the operation, it was all ultimately to serve the appetite of one power-hungry politician. There is too though, attached to the LBJ-theory, the possibility that he acted in cahoots with a cabal of Texas oil men who were pissed off that JFK planned to raise their taxes.
That would certainly make for a thicker plot, a more mutually beneficial conspiracy of dark forces. Yet my gut tells me this still really doesn't go far enough. Now granted, money can be a motivating factor for men of business, but again we don't see Presidents being assassinated regularly because of tax policy. Even if not just for the benefit of one usurper, it still seems unlikely that a small group of businessmen would conspire to launch a coup d'etat of the the United States government as a tax-evasion plot. Such an act has much more far-reaching implications than saving on your tax bill for a few years until another President gets into office.
This is not to say that they too, like Johnson were not also perhaps involved to some extent and acting in their own interests, but what could actually be so big and so powerful to be the driving force behind a plot to kill a sitting American President? Maybe JFK himself can give us some insight. Several versions of this video are available on YouTube, but this is a shorter version to cut right to the chase here...
"The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them." ~Patrick Henry
These secret societies that Kennedy spoke of are far more powerful, with plots far more sinister than tax evasion. These are the people who manage, or mismanage the destiny of nations from behind the scenes. These are the men who have the means and the will to assassinate an American President if he acts contrary to their designs.
"No matter who they vote for, they always vote for us." ~Illuminati Proverb
So we should then ask ourselves, okay, what secret society are we talking about here then? The CIA or an element within the CIA? Perhaps. The CIA certainly has blood on their hands from many plots and hold many secrets, and there are many who believe that elements within the Agency saw JFK as an actual threat to America through his hesitancy to act decisively against Castro. There was certainly a divergence of opinion between the Administration and the Agency on how to handle Cuba, but CIA are not quite a secret society either. They are a government agency, an instrument of policy, not the writers of it. Some see them as a government unto themselves, but that could be debated. It is more likely that if the CIA were involved in the assassination, as many believe, then it was probably a sort of "rogue" element within the agency, that may have fed on a general feeling of dissent in the agency toward a President who was weak on Communism. But could this rogue element have been operating all along on behalf of a more genuine secret society to whom they owed their true allegiance? Certainly possible even if we don't see it as probable at first glance.
So again, we are back to asking ourselves, what secret society? A remnant faction of Nazis left over from WWII perhaps? The popular dumbed-down version of history accepted by many folks today is the vastly oversimplified notion that the Nazis were vanquished and ceased to exist as an entity with the fall of Berlin. Of course, over the years there have been some Nazi war criminals hunted down in order to face justice for their atrocities against humanity during the war, but that is a far cry from any true enduring society and network of Nazi ideology. Scratch the surface a little deeper though, and you will learn that the only Nazis who were hunted down, were ones of little value or who failed to cultivate a relationship with either the Americans or the Soviets. So called "former" Nazis, even if still fascists in heart and mind, were quickly assimilated as valuable assets to American technological programs such as rocketry in the quest to reach outer-space, as well as intelligence operations to fight the Communists, ostensibly.
The most extreme theory traces the assassination to a group in the Defense Department that emerged around Werner von Braun and the Nazi rocket scientists the US military imported into the country illegally and against specific orders, and installed at Huntsville, Alabama at the end of WWII-the famous Operation Paperclip.
During the same period, the US government also absorbed a network of Nazi spies headed by Nazi General Reinhard Gehlen. "The Gehlen Org" (as it came to be called) worked within the US government to promote Nazi aims and to protect and resettle Nazis from Europe. In fact, the CIA was built around the Gehlen Org.
This theory postulates an incredible degree of fascist corruption within the US intelligence services. But one person who lends it plausibility is Clay Shaw, the New Orleans businessman District Attorney Jim Garrison tried for conspiracy in 1968 (and failed to convict). An exit poll of the Shaw jury indicated that Garrison lost his case because he was unable to prove that Shaw was connected to the CIA.
But the year Shaw died ( 1974), a book by a highly placed CIA defector, Victor Marchetti, revealed that the CIA helped Shaw in his legal struggle with Garrison. This may explain why the governors of three states refused to honor Garrison's subpoenas.
Shaw's New Orleans-based International Trade Mart was connected to the shadowy European firm, Permindex, which was kicked out of France in 1962 on suspicion of involvement in the attempted assassination of French president Charles de Gaulle. Permindex's board of directors included von Braun and many well-known European fascists. Some experts say Permindex was a front for the postwar international Nazi underground known as the Odessa.
Our sensibilities may reject the notion that the Nazis were still operating as a coherent entity and actually had anything at all to do with the JFK assassination, yet we do see their presence in our nation's most sensitive, most intimate operations. There is no reason to think that people bent on world domination and the destruction of America at one time, might not continue such an agenda with a plot to kill an American President. In the decades since then, an observant and objective student of American history might also discern the trend toward fascism in this country as well. Particularly in the last decade showing naked imperialistic aggression abroad, while locking down the "homeland" in a totalitarian police-state, making a mockery of the Constitution, the document which defines the true spirit of America.Without true respect for the principles of that document, we are the United States of America in name only.
“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined... The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government - lest it come to dominate our lives and interests.” ~Patrick Henry
Today we also see what may be the death-throes of a terminally flawed economic system. We are certainly suffering a great deal under it's yolk, more and more each year. There is much that Americans should, but do not know about the Federal Reserve System and our debt-based economy. In truth, it is a vampiric method by which to extract the wealth of the nation and to consolidate it within the hands of a few select elite families such as the Rothschilds, while enslaving the former owners of any natural wealth to shackles of perpetual debt. This is a matter of simple arithmetic actually, and the implementation of the method is a matter of documented history. This is not conspiracy-theory, this is fact, and it makes no difference if the government is controlled by Republicans or Democrats. The Federal Reserve is a private company whom we as a nation borrow our very own money from, at interest, since 1913. It's a plan that would piss off Jesus Christ himself, and did in fact, causing him to have his only documented violent outburst when he upset the tables of the money-changers at the Temple for the sin of usury.
How does this tie in with the assassination of JFK you ask? Actually, this is the basis of yet another established conspiracy theory behind why he was killed. Five months before his fateful ride in Dallas, the President issued Executive Order 11110.
"...to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denominations of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption..."
This was a direct assault on the monopoly of the private Federal Reserve Bank over the issuance of United States currency and their ability to maintain control over the nation through control of our debt. JFK planned to issue zero-interest currency of value, backed in a tangible commodity, rather than based on a system of debt and interest. The silver certificates virtually ensured that there would be no national debt and the bank would be cut out of enormous financial profits. The millions that the Texas oilmen stood to lose was a mere pittance compared to what the international banking cartel stood to lose not only monetarily, but also in form of raw political and military power as well. Through what is essentially blackmail, the banking cartel uses control of our debt in order to influence politics and to even use our military to do their bidding, whether it be to enforce their position in other countries where they already control central banks, or simply to expand their monetary empire with brute force. This was done in Iraq, and is being done now in Libya.
"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws." ~Mayer Amschel Rothschild
Is there any proof that the Federal Reserve Bank had anything to do with the assassination? Of course not, and there probably never will be. Especially now that the public is being sold on the idea that it was LBJ and pretty much LBJ alone who plotted to kill JFK. He may be the man most directly responsible for putting the plot in motion, but there is little doubt that he, like every President since Kennedy, was beholden to the hidden elites. Take note too of LBJ's timely demise, as pointed out in one of the articles linked above. A man who knew too much. Also note too, that no President since the assassination has dared to move in any way to undermine the Fed and indeed today seem more bent than ever on driving our economy right into the ground.While the Johnson may have had the most to gain from Kennedy's death, it was certainly the Federal Reserve Bank stood to lose the most if that administration were not stopped dead in it's tracks.
“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men´s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.” ~Woodrow Wilson
While we still may not have all the pieces to the puzzle, a clear picture begins now to emerge. We have an international banking cartel dominated by the Rothschild family, a dynasty begun in Germany of the mid-1700's. Within a few decades the Illuminati secret society, who some believe is the the most secretive and powerful secret society in the world, was also founded in Germany. Others maintain that the Illuminati was already extinguished by the time another now famous, yet highly secretive and mysterious secret society was founded at Yale University in the 1830's, amid a fervor of anti-Masonic/secret-society sentiment in the United States.
The The Order of Scull and Bones was established when one co-founder returned from studying in Germany. It was reputed to be a chapter of a corps in a German University when first established. This is supported by information gleaned after a break-in to the sinister "tomb," the society's meeting hall, in 1876. Today, the Skull and Bones counts many of the most powerful leaders in politics, finance, media and industry as having been initiated into their order. Again we see a Germanic influence in the affairs of the power-elite, but like we speculated about the Nazis above, Skull and Bones is also said to have a powerful influence over the U.S. intelligence community, particularly CIA. It is also interesting to note that Boneseman McGeorge Bundy served as national security adviser to both JFK and LBJ. According to the Wikipedia entry linked there, "He is known primarily for his role in escalating the involvement of the United States in Vietnam during the Kennedy and Johnson administrations." Which is of course was the big money, military-industrialist complex agenda that another former President tried to warn us about.
Perhaps it is coincidence too that elite secret society shares the same skull and bones symbology as that of pirate ships in days of old who flew the Jolly Roger, yet it would appear that in some ways they fancy themselves as pirates of sorts through their practice of "crooking," or looting from graves the skulls of people such as Geronimo, Pancho Villa, and Martin Van Buren. Could they also be point-men in the plundering of the nation's wealth by the supremely powerful banking cartel? Another famous representation of the skull and bones symbology was that of Death's Head, having a tradition going back again to Prussia of the 1700's, then on up to become the prominent symbol of the dreaded Nazi SS, particularly the SS-Totenkopfverbände who were responsible for administrating the concentration camps of the Third Reich and "The Final Solution."
There is yet another curious piece to this puzzle, again one of Germanic influence. This time, bringing us back again to the Nazis. While Obama is incessantly questioned about where he was born, it appears that there was another President who may not have been born in the United States, but instead was born in Germany and then subsequently adopted into a prestigious American family just before the outbreak of WWII. A family convicted of wrongdoing under the Trading With the Enemy Act during the war. There is a photo allegedly of this President as a boy, taken in the company of Martin Bormann, Josef Mengele and Otto Skorzeny who's names are now ubiquitous with Germany's Nazi regime. Also in the picture, Reinhard Gehlen who we mentioned above for his ties to post-war intelligence agency establishment. The claim that an American President was actually what amounts to a Nazi sleeper agent, born in Germany with a different surname, comes from the deathbed confessions of Otto Skorzeny and is supported by the photograph. We will show you that photo in a moment, but first, let's tie it all up together here now in one nice, neat, little package.
This same alleged German who became President of the United States also went to college at Yale, is a Bonesman, worked for the CIA becoming director, and although he can't seem to remember where he was on the day JFK was assassinated, we have this picture to remind him...
This is a snippet of a document that shows Bush was in the employ of the CIA at the time of the assassination. He denies this, claiming that he only ever worked for the CIA when appointed director:
The full memo is included in an article on the subject found at this link:
And, as promised, here is the picture of what is believed to be George H.W. Bush as a boy, the year before Hitler invaded Poland launching WWII, and when the future American President was still known as George H. Scherff:
We also know that the Bush family, whether they were actually his blood kin or not, were involved with the the financial architects of the Nazi Party, and that they continued to do business with them even after Pearl Harbor.
Considering that the family played a key role in the financial architecture of one country, Nazi Germany, it is no stretch of the imagination to guess that they may also play a key role in the financial architecture of this country, which we have already shown to be little more than a plundering of the nation's wealth by a few powerful elite.
While we are at it, we might as well go ahead and point out too, that there are some serious coincidences that many believe show Bush was behind the attempted assassination of yet another President, this time while he himself was vice-President. Was he a conspirator in the JFK assassination, who then went on to try to do what LBJ had done, perhaps at the behest of the very same secret overlords? Was the attempt on his life enough to stop Reagan from making a challenge to the power of those hidden elites in some way? "Bush Son Had Dinner Plans With Hinckley Brother Before Shooting" -Associated Press (March 31, 1981)
We know that Bush went on to become President anyway, followed then by Bush family friend Bill Clinton, and then later by Bush's son George W., who ushered in a new era of Nazi-esqe policy. Starting with the 9/11 attacks that have drawn comparisons to Hitler's staged Reichstag fire, to the trampling of liberty and freedom at home while practicing military imperialism abroad, to the use of terms like "homeland" and propagandized patriotism, the rapid and unprecedented expansion of domestic spying and national police agencies. Many of these programs continue to be expanded now too under President Obama, while the people are placated by rhetoric.
Is this the true legacy of the JFK assassination? Was this the actual agenda envisioned by the highest-level conspirators when they set a selfish and power-hungry vice-President on his task? Was the assassination indeed a coup d'etat which opened the door for all this to happen, letting in the wolves of fascism. the looting of our nation's wealth? Was all of this what Kennedy intended to prevent, with his undermining of the Fed? Was this what he warned about in his enigmatic speech about secret societies? And if they got away with this, for all this time, what chance do we have now of ever changing the consequences of that fateful day in Dealy Plaza?
"Demoralize the enemy from within by surprise, terror, sabotage, assassination. This is the war of the future." ~Adolf Hitler
Supreme Court rules Drug Companies exempt from Lawsuits July 7, 2013. Washington. In case readers missed it with all the coverage of the Trayvon Martin murder trial and the Supreme Court’s rulings on gay marriage and the Voting Rights Act, the US Supreme Court also made a ruling on lawsuits against drug companies for fraud, mislabeling, side effects and accidental death. From now on, 80 percent of all drugs are exempt from legal liability. In a 5-4 vote, the US Supreme Court struck down a lower court’s ruling and award for the victim of a pharmaceutical drug’s adverse reaction. According to the victim and the state courts, the drug caused a flesh-eating side effect that left the patient permanently disfigured over most of her body. The adverse reaction was hidden by the drug maker and later forced to be included on all warning labels. But the highest court in the land ruled that the victim had no legal grounds to sue the corporation because its drugs are exempt from lawsuits. Read more at: Whiteout Press
Supreme Court vs. The People: 5-to-4 Does It Again ...In other words, a drug company that kills or maims us by pushing drugs on us through the corrupt health care system and is beholden to profit only, stands protected in law. Yet, these same drug companies fund medical training and "made to order" research, as well as, exert extensive influence on FDA drug approval process. They wine and dine doctors and pay them consultant fees to ghost write on their behalf and become their front-line sales force. We the people take the risks with our lives... See the full article at: HuffPost Politics
Let me tell you why I am furious over the Zimmerman verdict. Not because of the verdict, but because of the ignorant response. We have a much bigger fight to fight my friends, and we are being undermined by this sideshow designed to divide us, the real people.
It seems clear enough that the media, the powers-that-be and the willfully ignorant all have one thing in common. They want a race war. Keeping America divided along racial and political lines prevents us from coming together and directing our rage toward the real culprits behind the true injustices in our society.
Zimmerman is not a racist, this trial should have never had anything to do with race whatsoever. Zimmerman is not white, he is a Latino with black heritage, black foster siblings, dated a black woman in high school, had a black business partner, voted for Obama, and even went to jail sticking up for a black homeless man being beat up by police. Yet somehow the focus of this trial has swirled around race, rather then the facts of the case.
Whatever you choose to believe about the case, whether he was justified in shooting Trayvon Martin, whether you believe he was actually attacked, whether you believe the prosecution failed to make their case or not, this all boils down to one relatively minor incident in the overall scheme of things in this country. This is not to belittle the suffering of Travon's family and friends, or even the hardships of those in the Zimmerman camp, but really, at the end of the day, this is one of thousands upon thousands of incidents that happen in this country every day. There is nothing particularly outstanding about this case, which is why the race-card has been pulled, to make it out to be much more than it ever really was.
Nevertheless, there is outrage over the incident and the acquittal, as misplaced as it really is. The country has never been more divided. But I ask you, where is the rage when it comes to the real issues? The issues that set precedent for us all? Where is the outrage against clear, unequivocal miscarriages of justices and government abuse of we the people? We the people, of all color and political ideals.
Where is the outrage over the fact that Federal authorities stormed a whole town, and ripped American citizens out of their own homes at gunpoint, house to house, like the Gestapo, without a warrant? Personally, I think this is certainly more deserving of rioting in the streets. Families Ripped From Homes By Police In Watertown (VIDEO)
And where is the outrage over the fact that police and the Feds opened fire with machine guns on an unarmed man hiding in a boat? A man they didn't even know whether or not was the actual Boston bombing suspect or not, and certainly had never proven was actually guilty of anything. To this day, the only evidence we have seen against the Tsarnev brothers is a pic of them walking with a backpack on, just like thousands of other people there that day. But even if there was clear evidence against him, it was imperative that he be taken alive for questioning, in the interest of public safety, to make sure there was not a larger plot and to smoke out other potential conspirators. And whether or not he is actually guilty of anything, the police still have no right to murder an unarmed man, no matter what he has done or is accused of. So where is the outrage over that? Bombing Suspect Was Not Armed
What happened out there in Boston, that is the real battleground for our rights, as a nation, and no one is rioting, no one is protesting, everyone is just following the government version of the story without question like good little sheeple and condoning the attempted murder of an unarmed suspect. That unarmed suspect could have just as easily been Trayvon Martin after all.
We all went along with the 9/11 story too, at first. And as the years have rolled by, more and more of us have woken up to the fact that we were lied to. Maybe we don't know exactly what happened that day, but we know damn well we were lied to. And in the end, all we wound up with was a big fat tax debt for endless war, the liberty crushing Patriot Act, and Federal agents molesting children in airports.
But we don't even have to look at big massive (and very real) conspiracies like this to be outraged. Where is the outrage over the rights of the few, the patriots, the people like you and I of every race, creed, religion and background?
Where was the outrage when this man faced decades in prison for exercising freedom of speech and freedom of the press to reveal police brutality against a child in a school? Where were the protests in the streets across the country when this man was convicted, setting a precedent that takes away the free speech of all of us, black, white, and across the board?
And of course the drug scandals with cops are incessant. In my home county alone there have been two high profile cases recently. Cocaine Cop Gets 3/1 Years
I know, I know, these cases are serious enough to cause riots in the streets of every major city because of what they say about how our government treats us, but Trayvon is dead. At least those people who were ripped out of their homes in Watertown are still alive. And the little kids who were killed in those kiddi porn snuff films distributed by the FBI, well, the FBI didn't actually kill them, I guess.
Okay, fair enough. But what about when the FBI is complicit in plans to assassinate American protesters?
In this Florida case, a man was shot dead in front of his girlfriend after he opened the door with a gun in hand, defending his home against unannounced intruders. Police freely admit that they did not identify themselves as they tried to pound in the door to the residence. Cops Deny Negligence After Killing Innocent Man in His Home
And in this case, police shot a man dead after an unannounced entry on a no-knock warrant for a person they admit they knew full well that she no longer resided at that location.
And sometimes rape does not require penetration. In this case, a schoolteacher was brutalized and stripped naked by jail guards after she called 911 for help after being the victim of a violent assault at her home.
Oh wait, I get it. A lot of these cases show white people being brutalized by the system. That doesn't count, in some books. And even though Zimmerman was neither white, nor racist, we are gonna spin it that way.
Don't believe the hype people. We are not eachother's enemy.
I am a white dude that grew up listening to rap and hip-hop, in a deliberate effort to break down lines of racial hatred. I still love my ol' school jams, oxtail, and friends with soul.
Do the cops racially profile? Yeah, probably, to some extent. There is moron in any bunch. But I will tell you this much. I have been that 17-year old troublemaker out there on the block that got profiled for my urban apparel. It's not the color of your skin, it's the uniform you wear.
Zimmerman himself told 911 he wasn't sure if the "suspect" was black or not. He wasn't profiling his skin, he was suspicious of his movements, that he was out of place. Zimmerman was "profiling" mode of dress and walk, body language, not melanin.
As I said, I am a white dude. But when I dress and step like I am a "f*ck the system" sort of dude, it should come as no surprise that people take notice their is a thug mofo in their midst. You don't want to be profiled? Dress like a herb and don't step like a G.
In other words, don't drive around with a "funk da police" bumper sticker and then act like you were singled out for no reason.
We have enough troubles with very real harassment by police, with very real violations of liberty, without making it a race issue.
In short, where is your rage, your anger, your protests, your riots, over the very real issues that keep us all down? It's not black vs. white. It's liberty vs. fascism.
I could share hundreds, thousands of instances of corruption and injustice. Why are we not protesting, rioting, revolting? Why are we so divided over one case of violence that is so ambiguous?
Don't believe the hate.
Some of the articles I have already shared are duplicated in this article, but there are videos and links that were not included here, that were shown in the following piece:
Sadly enough, cases like this are not particularly rare. This is actually a favored method for women to dispatch of the men in their lives, once they have decided to kill. While men are certainly not immune from hiring a contractor to murder their spouse or partner, often they prefer to take on the task themselves.
Women are more likely to hire someone, or even to manipulate a new lover into getting rid of the disfavored through murder. Often times these crimes will never be uncovered. And even when they are, the crime you see taking place in the videos below are not counted in domestic violence statistics, making those stats biases against males.
Also note how chillingly psychotic the young woman is, wanting an extra week with her husband, not wanting him to suffer, and essentially wanting to kill him because she doesn't want to "break his heart."
MUSKEGON, Mich. — Julia Charlene Merfeld said she wanted her husband killed because “it was easier than divorcing him.” That explanation came in a meeting with a man Merfeld thought she was hiring to do the murder. Merfeld, 21, of Muskegon didn’t know the man was really an undercover police detective, or that she was being recorded on a hidden video camera. Merfeld pleaded guilty June 27 to solicitation to murder. Chief Muskegon County Circuit Judge William C. Marietti committed to cap her minimum sentence at six years. The maximum can be anything up to life in prison, depending on Marietti’s decision at her sentencing July 30. PoliceOne.com
The FBI knew of a plot to assassinate persons seen as protest "leaders" in the Occupy Wall Street movement, but failed to act and has continued to protect the identity of the would-be assassins.
An identified [DELETED] as of October planned to engage in sniper attacks against protestors (sic) in Houston, Texas if deemed necessary. An identified [DELETED] had received intelligence that indicated the protesters in New York and Seattle planned similar protests in Houston, Dallas, San Antonio and Austin, Texas. [DELETED] planned to gather intelligence against the leaders of the protest groups and obtain photographs, then formulate a plan to kill the leadership via suppressed sniper rifles. (Note: protests continued throughout the weekend with approximately 6000 persons in NYC. ‘Occupy Wall Street’ protests have spread to about half of all states in the US, over a dozen European and Asian cities, including protests in Cleveland (10/6-8/11) at Willard Park which was initially attended by hundreds of protesters.)
This document shows that the plot remains in effect. On 13 October 20111, writer sent via email an excerpt from the daily [DELETED] regarding FBI Houston’s [DELETED] to all IAs, SSRAs and SSA [DELETED] This [DELETED] identified the exploitation of the Occupy Movement by [LENGTHY DELETION] interested in developing a long-term plan to kill local Occupy leaders via sniper fire.
The FBI's failure to act against this clear act of domestic terrorism against American citizens practicing Constitutionally protected activities, was "explained" by the director of the FBI's media office, Paul Breeson, as follows:
The FOIA documents that you reference are redacted in several places pursuant to FOIA and privacy laws that govern the release of such information so therefore I am unable to help fill in the blanks that you are seeking. Exemptions are cited in each place where a redaction is made. As far as the question about the murder plot, I am unable to comment further, but rest assured if the FBI was aware of credible and specific information involving a murder plot, law enforcement would have responded with appropriate action.
It's no secret that underground places have long offered a refuge for mankind, particularly in times of trouble. The ancient underground cities of Cappadocia are a wonderful example of the lengths man will go to in order to use the Earth for protection against danger.
But today we don't really think of underground cities as being part of our modern reality. Our houses have basements where we might hole up in case of a bad storm, maybe a tornado shelter out in the yard. Many of our cities do extend underground with utility tunnels and subway tunnels, but we don't really think of those places as underground cities. In places like London the stark utility corridors beneath the city did serve as a place of refuge from the bombs of enemies, but areas like that beneath our cities are not designed for permanent nor comfortable living.
During the Cold War some folks took to building actual bomb shelters in their basements and back yards. Larger buildings like schools and office buildings stocked more elaborate fallout shelters in their basements. Of course, the government had the most elaborate facilities dug below ground and under mountains. Thousands of subterranean nuclear missile silos were all answerable to what may be the world's most famous underground bunker.
The Cold War is over now though. The mission of NORAD still exists, but has taken on a largely different more diversified role than the bunker was originally purposed for. Nuclear missile silos have been abandoned or sold off as unique real-estate opportunities. Fallout shelters have become the relics of a bygone era, sometimes tourist attractions, but mostly used to store old furniture.
The threat of a nuclear holocaust being rained down on us from the skies above is over. The need for these underground secret and secure places appears to have passed. Or has it really?
Conspiracy theories abound of secret underground places of all sorts. Everything from new and ongoing construction, to secret bases infested with aliens, even to a theory that the Earth itself is actually hollow and an populated by a hidden civilization. Mysterious Denver Airport (VIDEO)
Hollow Earth, aliens? Well, maybe maybe not. That's a big leap, but we need less faith for other theories, especially when seeing is believing. There are rumors of a vast underground network of cities, massive storage facilities, roadways, and maybe even a supersonic underground railroad. The network is believed to span the entire continent with hubs in many major cities.
I personally have spoken with a truck driver who made numerous deliveries to a massive underground facility just outside of Albany, the state capitol of NY, which he described as being much like what we are about to see here in these videos. This was about two years ago now, and he said the facility appeared to still be under construction. He is not really the conspiracy theory sort at all, an old school hard working, simple sort of man, so I didn't really have any reason to doubt him. But of course, you can't believe everything you read on the internet, and my acquaintance did not provide me with any pictures that I could share with you. Fortunately, other truck drivers have captured glimpses of facilities like this all over the country.
This particular branch of the conspiracy theory realm is often termed "D.U.M.B.S." or Deep Underground Military Bunkers. I believe this is a bit of misnomer though. From what we see there in those very real bits of footage it there is nothing specifically military, but rather they appear to be corporate controlled facilities. That is not to say that the military is not involved at all of course, or ultimately in charge even, but the corporate influence cannot be ignored.
The Iron Mountain company is a leading example of a relationship between government and the corporate world when it comes to underground secrets. Established on the banks of the Hudson River in 1951, the company was reformed in the 1970's and now it's most famous facility the one featured in this news report.
One curious point I note though, is the difference between what we see there in the Iron Mountain video, and what we saw in the other videos. The sheer difference in size, when it comes to the dimensions of the tunnels and passageways is curious indeed. Then of course, we also have to ask why companies and/or the government are going to such expense, a hidden expense at that, for such a vast underground network. Surely all of these facilities can't be there simply to store business documents and historical artifacts.
And again, we have to consider that these facilities may be interconnected, all or most of them anyway. Numerous truck drivers have reported driving from one region of the country to another, completely underground. Frankly, I believe that much. The way they talk about it, certain details, just strikes me as credible testimony.The technological feat is impressive, but not impossible. The only reason I would really have to doubt it, is that there is no clear or obvious motivation for the power that be to go to all that trouble, unless of course they know something they aren't telling us. (Or, maybe this is just the way the uber-wealthy piss away their fortunes while the working stiff hovers on the edge of starvation in order to feed their corporate mechanisms.)
If we accept that this underground network of cities, facilities and roadways does indeed exist, then it is no stretch to accept the evidence of a massive facility under the Denver airport. The evidence of that is already strong anyway. But an airport right smack dab in the middle of the country would be ideal as a central transportation and distribution hub for goods to be transported by air, on land, and below it. Not to mention the fact too that the Denver airport is not very far from the Cheyenne Mountain facility in Colorado Springs, the central hub of U.S. military power outside of the Pentagon, and the one most likely to have command of U.S. forces after some cataclysmic event like nuclear war or perhaps an asteroid impact.
So all in all, it looks like some of the stuff that conspiracy theorists are admonished for, and called crackpots or lunatics, actually has some pretty common sense conclusions. Maybe we don't know exactly why they are doing this, but at the same time, it really doesn't seem any more far-fetched than a secret underground bunker for Congress under a famous resort.
Well, that's about it for now. Hope you enjoy the material. This is Captain Six reporting for the Underground, from the Underground, on the underground.
Ask yourself something. Why doesn't anyone eff with Switzerland? Why does the Pope have a Swiss Guard? Why was the antichrist himself, Adolf Hitler, too scared to invade Switzerland while he pocketed the rest of Europe?
Do you really think that money in your pocket, in your bank account, is yours? Bwahahaha! Joke's on you fool! It's not your money, you rent it, at interest.
An immensely powerful international organization that most people have never even heard of secretly controls the money supply of the entire globe. It is called the Bank for International Settlements, and it is the central bank of central banks. It is located in Basel, Switzerland, but it also has branches in Hong Kong and Mexico City. It is essentially an unelected, unaccountable central bank of the world that has complete immunity from taxation and from national laws. Even Wikipedia admits that "it is not accountable to any single national government." The Bank for International Settlements was used to launder money for the Nazis during World War II, but these days the main purpose of the BIS is to guide and direct the centrally-planned global financial system. Today, 58 global central banks belong to the BIS, and it has far more power over how the U.S. economy (or any other economy for that matter) will perform over the course of the next year than any politician does. Every two months, the central bankers of the world gather in Basel for another "Global Economy Meeting". During those meetings, decisions are made which affect every man, woman and child on the planet, and yet none of us have any say in what goes on. The Bank for International Settlements is an organization that was founded by the global elite and it operates for the benefit of the global elite, and it is intended to be one of the key cornerstones of the emerging one world economic system. It is imperative that we get people educated about what this organization is and where it plans to take the global economy. Sadly, only a very small percentage of people actually know what the Bank for International Settlements is, and even fewer people are aware of the Global Economy Meetings that take place in Basel on a bi-monthly basis.
Several days ago British defence contractor Britam came under cyber attack and went offline. A hacker going by the handle "JAsIrX" has uploaded a cache of documents stolen in the attack, and they are now being circulated online.
The documents are considered to confidential and secret, but at first glance appear to be rather mundane. Reports of employees getting in trouble for being drunk, passport information, things that might rightly be considered confidential but nothing particularly newsworthy.
But there is a very serious exception.
One uncovered document shows plans for what is known as a false-flag attack. That is, to make a military strike under the guise of being someone else.
In this case, Qatar is making an offer to the British contractor to participate in and help orchestrate a false flag attack in Syria using chemical weapons. The document states that the operation has the backing of the United States. The plan is/was to have the contractor deliver a chemical weapon to Homs, Syria. The weapon itself to be acquired from Libya so that it would be the same Russian-make and therefore the same sort that Assad would be expected to have in his own arsenal. Ukranian mercenaries under contract with Britam already, would then be used to actually carry out and document the attack, speaking Russian, and giving the appearance of being Russian military.
Specifically, one email reads:
Phil
We've got a new offer. It's about Syria again. Qataris
propose an attractive deal and swear that the idea is approved by
Washington.
We'll have to deliver a CW to Homs, a Soviet origin g-shell from
Libya similar to those that Assad should have. They want us to deploy our
Ukrainian personnel that should speak Russian and make a video
record.
Frankly, I don't think it's a good idea but the sums proposed
are enormous. Your opinion?
Kind regards
David
Here is a screenshot of the actual email, click to enlarge.
For more technical data including the full cache of documents, please visit: Cyber War News
For a more detailed article related to this information visit: Land Destroyer Report
I like a good conspiracy theory as much as the next guy living in his Mom's basement, but the so called "Moon landing hoax" really doesn't have me at all convinced. It has been a popular conspiracy theory for some time now, getting a fair amount of play even in the mainstream media. I have to admit, that I dug into it for a time looking through the photos, the footage, the documents. I read the arguments and engaged in the debates on conspiracy forums. I didn't make up my mind ahead of time, so I went back and forth almost believing and then almost not believing men ever landed on the Moon.
Today, I have settled it enough in my own mind to close the discussion, unless of course, some new ground-breaking bit of evidence were to come forth. My humble opinion is that if we can build an atomic bomb, put it on the tip of a missile and fly it to Moscow, then I am pretty sure we could land some men on the Moon. So if the Moon landing was a hoax, the Cold War probably was too. But that's a different conspiracy theory.
In the meantime though, and in the interest of fair play, I want to give you a look at this great article I read a number of years ago now, that really unsettled me. It's pretty convincing that the moon landing might very well have been hoaxed largely in part by one Stanley Kubrick, famous film maker. So have a read, and then watch the great video afterwards which provides the wonderful counterpoint and should close the door on this conspiracy theory.
Or just go ahead and skip the mumbo jumbo for now and jump on down to the video.
Secret of The Shining: Or How Faking the Moon Landins Almost Cost Stanley Kubrick His Marriage and His Life
The Shining is surely
Stanley Kubrick's
most misunderstood masterpiece.
I use the word 'masterpiece' guardedly because I have never really
thought that The Shining was a very good film.
At the time, in 1980 when I first saw it, I didn't like it at all.
The way that Kubrick threw out so much of Stephen King's great
source material and replaced it with a lot of things that just
didn't seem to make any sense, really bothered me.
Hopefully, before I am finished with this essay, the reader will see
it is only when Kubrick dramatically alters the script from Stephen
King's novel that we can begin to understand what Stanley Kubrick is
trying to tell us in his version of The Shining.
It should be understood from the beginning that The Shining is
Stanley Kubrick's most personal film (outside of, possibly, Eyes
Wide Shut). Before we are done here it will be easy to see that
Kubrick was only using Stephen King's novel as a launching pad
(excuse the pun) to be able to tell a completely different story
under the guise of making a film based on a best-selling novel.
He
did this for a very important reason - mainly to save his life.
Let's not get too far ahead of ourselves.
In fact, let's start at the beginning.
There are two main characters in the film, Jack Torrance (played by
Jack Nicholson) and his son Danny (played by Danny Lloyd).
It is important to understand here that Jack and Danny are two
aspects of Stanley Kubrick himself. Jack is the practical, pragmatic
guy who wants to be a great artist. And he is, apparently, willing
to do anything to accomplish his goal of being an artist (writer).
Jack, like Stanley has black hair, he is idiosyncratic and even
smokes the same cigarettes as Stanley (Marlboro).
Danny is the other side of the great director. He is the child-like
Kubrick. It is Danny who is actually the real artist.
The Danny side of Kubrick side is psychic, youthful and sees things
that no one else sees. Danny also has a tendency to tell people
things that should be kept quiet.
The first part of the The Shining is probably the longest, most
boring, 58 minutes in Kubrick's career.
The opening of the film takes place with us witnessing Stanley's
pragmatic side, Jack, cutting a deal with the Manager of the
Overlook Hotel.
The deal between Jack and the Manager of the Overlook is that Jack
can write (that is - create) all that he wants as long as he "takes
care" of The Overlook.
One other important point is that the Manager of The Overlook tells
Jack that the previous caretaker went crazy from the stress of the
job and killed his wife and two girls.
Jack says he is "intrigued" but takes the deal anyway.
The Manager of the Overlook Hotel is wearing red, white and blue.
Jack's wife Wendy (played by Shelly Duval) and his son Danny also
wear red, white and blue for almost the entire first hour of the
film.
In this symbolic interpretation the Overlook Hotel is AMERICA. It
was built, just like the Manager says, on the graves of Indians.
Even when walking on the floor of the Overlook Hotel, one finds
oneself trampling over various Native American symbols.
The Overlook Hotel itself is America.
Like America, the Overlook Hotel is new and shiny. It is
ostentatious, corny and architecturally boring.
As the Manager tells
Wendy,
"All of the best people stayed here".
But there is something very deep happening. Kubrick brushed
shoulders with
the elite of the world. He knows what is going on.
We have to begin to understand Kubrick's story from his use of
symbols. As I like to say: if a picture is worth a thousand words,
then a symbol is worth a thousand pictures. For it will be through
the use of symbol that the real story of The Shining can be
revealed.
The Manager of the Overlook, while interviewing Jack, has an
American Eagle right behind his head.
It is as if "The Eagle" is the
power behind the Manager.
Not only is the Eagle the symbol of America but it should be noted
that the Lunar Lander of the Apollo 11 mission was called "The
Eagle".
To the Manager's right on the desk is an American flag.
Symbolically the Manager (played by Barry Nelson) is the face of the
government of the United States. Jack has cut this deal with the
government to be the "caretaker" of the Hotel.
The Manager tells Jack that his main job is to prevent the Overlook
Hotel (America) from appearing like it is decaying. The Manager
reiterates that this is Jack's primary responsibility.
On their first day in the Hotel, Danny has a vision of the previous
caretaker's daughters, and he sees that they are twins. The previous
caretaker's daughters were not twins in the Stephen King novel. This
discrepancy between the book and the film will grow in importance as
we continue.
Jack, Danny and Wendy also meet Dick Halorann who is the cook for
the Overlook. He befriends Danny and it is through him that Danny
discovers that he is not alone when it comes to psychic ability.
Dick warns Danny to stay away from Room 237.
Jack, Wendy and Danny have now fully moved into the Hotel. There is
a long cold winter ahead of them. At first Jack loves the hotel but
he is having problems with his writing. Also he cannot sleep.
Meanwhile Wendy and Danny are having fun.
Jack is not writing. Instead he is throwing a tennis ball at the
wall in the room where his typewriter sits.
On the wall, which is
being struck by the tennis ball, is a Native American artistic motif
that looks suspiciously like a group of rockets about to be
launched.
Jack throwing the
ball at the rocket/arrows on the wall.
Apollo was the god of Archery. Jack is playing ball with Apollo's
arrows
Finally the ball bounces away from Jack and disappears into the
darkness of the hotel.
Jack walks over and looks down at the model
of the maze. He sees Wendy and Danny caught in the middle of the
maze, totally unaware of the nature of the deal that he has cut with
the Overlook.
A cold winter storm has now blown over the Hotel.
The oncoming storm
is a symbol of the Cold War between Russia and the United States. Of
course the Cold War is also one of the driving forces for the entire
reason for faking the moon landings. It was necessary to hide the
advanced U.S. saucer technology from the Soviet Union.
We were
living in a very dangerous world and it was shrewd to hide our
advanced technology from the Russians. This is the reason for the
bears that are seen all over The Shining.
The Russian Bear, and its
competition for the race to the Moon, was a driving force behind
having to fake the Apollo Moon landings.
Jack, his family, and the Overlook Hotel, are trapped in the Cold,
just as America was trapped in the Cold War with Russia.
The stuffed
bears, seen through out the film, are the Soviet Empire's symbol.
Symbolically the Bears seen through the film are also the
representation of the pressure that the Russians put on the USA to
get to the Moon. They had to fake the moon landings and cover up
the
real truth behind the flying saucer craft and machinery that the US
government actually has created and employed since World War Two.
Danny is riding his bike through the halls of The Overlook when he
comes upon the twin daughters of the previous caretaker.
They stare
at Danny and together they say:
"Come play with us Danny. Forever
and ever."
Danny turns and wheels it out of there.
At this point in the film we graphically discover the nature of the
deal that Jack really cut with the Manager of the Overlook:
It is the most crucial scene in the film. Danny is in a hallway
playing with his trucks. Suddenly, out of nowhere, The Project, the
Overlook Hotel, rolls the tennis ball, from nowhere, at him.
It is a
gesture that says:
"Wanna play?"
It is here that we discover what
happened to Jack's tennis ball that was previously swallowed up by
the darkness of the Overlook.
We also discover what game it is that
the twin daughters of the previous caretaker were inviting Danny to
play.
Mystified by where the ball came from, Danny stands up, and the
audience finally sees what the nature of the Project really is
about:
As Danny stands up, the answer is revealed in an instant. Danny is
wearing a sweater with a crudely sewn rocket pictured on the front.
On the rocket clearly seen on Danny's sweater are the words: APOLLO
11.
The audience watching the film literally sees the launch of Apollo
11, right before their eyes, as Danny rises from the floor. It isn't
the real launch of Apollo 11, it is, of course, the symbolic
launching of Apollo 11. In other words - it isn't real.
What happens next is crucial to understanding everything else that
happens in the film.
Danny, bewildered, walks down the hallway. He sees that Room 237 -
the room that Halorann warned him about - has a key in the lock and
the door is wide open.
It is important to note that the room in question was numbered
217
in the Stephen King version of The Shining. For unknown reason's
Kubrick changed it to 237.
Those unknown reasons are about to be come known.
Danny is literally carrying a symbolic Apollo 11, on his body, via
the sweater, to the Moon as he walks over to room 237.
Why do I
think this?
Because the average distance from the Earth to the Moon is 237,000
miles.
The real truth is that this movie is really about the deal that
Stanley Kubrick made with the Manager of the Overlook Hotel
(America). This deal was to get Kubrick to re-create, in other
words, to fake, the Apollo 11 Moon landing.
Danny represents the artistic side of Kubrick. Because of the
complexity of the artistic realization of the manner in which the
lunar landings needed to appear, Kubrick needed to trust his
artistic side.
Room 237 represents the fake lunar set that Stanley had to create to
make the lunar landings appear factual. But really, on this set, and
in this room, nothing is real.
As the film will soon reveal, Room 237 has to be lied about. It
cannot be understood at all… ever. Nothing real ever happens in room 237.
For a moment, in the film, it looks like Danny is actually going to
enter Room 237. But we are never sure.
In the next scene Jack has a bad dream while he is working. He tells
Wendy that in his dream he has killed Wendy and Danny.
Meanwhile Danny enters the scene and it is obvious that some
mysterious force has physically hurt Danny.
This mysterious force
has also torn his Apollo 11 sweater.
Wendy, horrified, thinks that Jack did it.
In a way she is right because Danny got hurt because of the deal
that Jack cut.
Frustrated, Jack goes to the bar located in the Gold Room. Obviously
stressed, Jack whispers to no one that he would sell his soul for a
drink.
It is then that Jack meets the real manager of the Overlook Hotel. A
mysterious man suddenly appears behind the bar.
His name is Lloyd
and he is the bartender of the Overlook Hotel.
Clearly Stanley Kubrick shows Lloyd in a Satanic light.
Lloyd seduces Jack with a drink.
Jack has sold his soul to the Project, to being the caretaker of the
Overlook.
Jack and Lloyd's conversation is interrupted by Wendy's entrance.
Lloyd and Jack's glass of Scotch suddenly disappear. Wendy tells
Jack that someone else is in the hotel.
Jack then goes to Room 237 and sees the manifestation of a young
woman into an old woman.
Because Room 237 is, symbolically, the Lunar Set for Apollo 11, Jack
has to lie to Wendy about what is going on in the room. He tells her
that nothing is going on in Room 237. It is apparent that Danny must
have hurt himself.
It is true, Danny did get hurt because of Jack. Danny is the side of
Stanley that knew of Stanley's secret project. Somehow he got into a
situation where they (The Overlook Hotel - America) hurt him.
After this Jack begins to go to hell physically.
He is growing an
unkempt beard and is not combing his hair - two things that Stanley
Kubrick was known for doing, or not doing, himself.
Now Jack (Nicholson) is looking a lot like Stanley Kubrick.
Especially as he began to appear under the stress of the twin
productions going on at once:
It should also be noted that Jack and
Stanley are about the same age and they have the same hair color.
Early
2001 - A Space Odysey Production photos show a youthful and
un-bearded Kubrick with combed hair, looking quite handsome. But
photos taken four years later - near the end of the production of
2001: A Space Odyssey - show that Kubrick was a physical wreck. The
de-evolution of Stanley Kubrick's appearance during the production
of 2001: A Space Odyssey is disturbingly close to Jack Torrance's
(Jack Nicholson's) appearance in The Shining.
Despite his disheveled appearance Jack has started writing again.
Wendy, (who is really supposed to be Kubrick's wife Christina),
wants to read the book that Jack is working so furiously on. She
asks to see what he is writing. Jack is surprised by her entrance
into the room where he does his writing. Angrily he rejects her. He
tells her to stay out of the room where he is writing.
It is clear that Wendy, Kubrick's wife, is not allowed to know
anything about the Project.
But what is this book that Jack is writing?
Wendy soon finds out what is in the book that Jack is writing. It is
then that we get the clincher that proves that this essay is the
correct interpretation of Kubrick's The Shining.
Wendy sneaks into Jack's writing room. Slowly she begins to read the
book that Jack has been working on.
This scene is totally original to the movie. It is not in the King
novel. Although it is mildly terrifying, it is not that horrific.
Yet it is the centerpiece of the film and arguably the scariest
scene in the movie.
Why?
Because every single one of the hundreds of pages that Jack has been
furiously writing is a variation of only one sentence:
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy".
Incredibly every page has this exact sentence.
And it is written
over and over.
Truly it is scary enough to think that Jack has just
been sitting there, day after day, writing the same sentence, over
and over. Wendy face reveals her fear over the discovery.
What does it all mean?
May I humbly suggest that the word "All" in this repeated sentence
actually stands for "A11" that is: "A-One-One", or Apollo 11?
"A11 work and no play makes Jack a dull boy."
May I suggest that the nickname, or the
code name, for the faking of
the Apollo Moon Missions was A11?
Accepting that this is true we can see what Stanley is really
telling us:
'"Apollo 11 work and no play makes Jack (Kubrick) a dull boy."
If you think that I am stretching things here I would like to point
out the patch that NASA had created to symbolize the Apollo program:
There are other 'A's' in the film also.
The Overlook Hotel has
several A's' built into its construction when viewed from the
outside:
Stanley has used these A's before also.
Here is the cover of A
Clockwork Orange with Alex menacingly coming out of the 'A' with his
all-seeing-eye cufflink:
It is clear from the evidence presented in the film that Kubrick's
wife (Shelly Duval) had discovered that he (Stanley Kubrick) had
made a secret deal with the Manager of the Overlook, (i.e.) with the
rulers of the USA.
Shelly Duval (Christina Kubrick) also discovered that what she
thought was one thing actually turned out to be another. What Mrs.
Kubrick discovered was that - instead of making a science fiction
film called 2001: A Space Odyssey - her husband was really working
to create the fake Apollo moon landings.
At this point the film finally gets really interesting. Frightened
by this revelation Wendy (Stanley's wife) wants Jack (Stanley) to
quit the Project.
Jack (Stanley) angrily replies:
"That is so typical of you! … I've
made an agreement … I have obligations to my employers!"
Danny uses The Shining to contact Dick Halorann in Florida (which I
might add is where Apollo 11 was launched). Dick laboriously travels
from Florida to Colorado.
In another abrupt break with the novel, Jack Torrance kills Halorann
as soon as he arrives at the Overlook (so much for Halorann's
psychic abilities!)
While I think this scene is very disturbing and I doubt if I can
ever prove this but I think Stanley Kubrick is telling us something
very definite with this alteration to the King novel.
I believe that the naïve side of him, represented by Danny, told
someone that he, Kubrick, was faking the Apollo missions.
He may
even have told this person that he was faking the lunar landings for
NASA while also appearing to produce
the film 2001: A Space Odyssey. Hallorin is the representation of the person that Kubrick mistakenly
revealed this most secret of all information. Because of that,
Hallorin, or the person who Stanley told, had to die.
The secret must remain safe.
This also explains why Kubrick had to
hide all of this crucial information inside the construct of the
King novel. Kubrick wanted the story to get out, but he was also
afraid for his life. Kubrick had to fake the making of the Stephen
King novel so that he could reveal that he was involved in the
faking the moon landings!
The truth is that The Shining is the story of how Stanley Kubrick
cut a deal with the U.S. Government to fake the Apollo moon
landings.
It is also the story of how Kubrick may have accidentally told
someone what he had done and how that person had to be killed. The Shining is also the story of how faking the Apollo moon landings
almost sacrificed his relationship with his wife.
Finally it is the story of how Stanley Kubrick barely escaped alive
to create another day.
The Shining is the story of how a part of Stanley Kubrick was killed
by the agreement that he made with the U. S. government to become
the "caretaker" of The Project called A11 or Apollo 11.
It is also the story of the history of NASA.
This explains why the previous "caretaker" was so pressured and
stressed that he had to kill his TWIN daughters.
Why?
Because the previous NASA missions before Apollo were named Gemini!
There is much more in this film than can be discussed here. I am
sure that much more will be discovered.
I present this tidbit of an interpretation to show not only that
Stanley Kubrick directed the Apollo moon landings but also to ask
NASA to release all of Kubrick's Apollo moon landing footage in
their original, glorious 70 mm film.
It is time to shed the lies. But also it is time for the world to
view, uncensored, Stanley Kubrick's greatest unknown masterpiece. I
ask NASA to release all of the footage directed by Kubrick for the
faked Apollo landings.
May I also suggest that NASA use the millions of dollars made from
this surely successful movie release to fund another mission to the
moon?
I mean it has only been 35 years!
Also - may I suggest a title for this new Kubrick film?
How about:
Never A Straight Answer? (NASA)
The books in Jack’s apartment reflect the dual nature of Stanley
Kubrick.
The book on top is entitled “The Wise Child” represented in
the film by Danny
and the book below is entitled “The Manipulator”
which is represented by Jack.
Seven Apollo missions went to the moon, but only six landed.
Five challenges facing Mark Carney
-
From a faltering economy to high expectation from the public, parliament's
return could bring challenges for Canada's new PM.
Research as reconciliation: Oil sands and health
-
Canada's government and health science sectors should commit to researching
the health effects of oil sands tailings, as previous research suggests
that ai...
NATO has no defenses against drones – Western media
-
[image: Preview] A drone incident in Poland blamed on Russia has shown that
NATO is not ready to repel similar attacks, Western media have reported
Read Fu...
This feed has moved and will be deleted soon. Please update your
subscription now.
-
The publisher is using a new address for their RSS feed. Please update your
feed reader to use this new URL:
*http://www.alternet.org/home/feed*
The Hemp Industry / Staying Positive
-
Air Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020
Doug Fine discussed the many amazing properties of hemp. Followed by Eldon
Taylor on staying positive in the COVID-19 era.
The Alzheimer’s Drug that Might Unlock Your Dreams
-
As excited as I get about the potentiality of psychedelic drugs, I get far
more amped about pushing the boundaries of dreams as I’m not sure there are
an...
DOJ Stumbles at Hearing on Detaining Immigrants
-
Criticizing an attorney for the government for arguing issues he never
raised in briefing, the First Circuit seemed likely at a hearing Wednesday
to u...
Mom Has Stacked Dinner Party Roster
-
GOLDEN, CO—Their eyes widening in amazement as the 43-year-old rattled off
the names of heavy hitter after heavy hitter, impressed members of the
Dreesh...
