General Wesley Clark Says 'War on Terror' Was Planned

The following supporting piece comes from Washington's Blog. (Please visit that link to see the article in its original format.)

Wesley Clark, Supreme Allied Commander NATO, testifies in this 2-minute video that the US planned to overthrow seven countries after 9/11: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.
The Pentagon admitted a strategy to do so (here, here, here):

1. the US conducts acts of terrorism in nations they want to control,
2. the US continues terrorism to provoke an act of reprisal,
3. the US labels the reprisal “terrorism” to justify covert and overt military operations to overthrow targeted governments.

Therefore, the US caused the “war on terror” as a policy choice; 9/11 was pretense and not the cause.

Indeed, war law and two UN Security Council Resolutions provided international cooperation for factual discovery of the 9/11 terrorists, arrests, and trial for lawful justice all nations supported.

The US rejects the rule of law, violates treaty obligations, killed over a million human beings from armed attacks since 9/11, and so far has long-term costs of $4 to $6 trillion to US taxpayers ($40 – $60,000 per household).

This rogue state of the US ends when enough Americans in military, law enforcement, government, media, education, and the general public have sufficient intellectual integrity and moral courage to accept the “emperor has no clothes” obvious facts.

This unlawful policy choice of the US for Wars of Aggression has killed 20-30 million people in covert and overt wars since 1945. It follows a long history of lie-began and treaty-violated wars of choice to steal land and resources, as I’ve reminded the public before:

1. The US regularly violated treaties with Native Americans, as well as manipulating their meaning for the purpose of stealing their land.

2. US President Polk lied to Congress to initiate a War of Aggression in Mexico. The result was the US taking 40% of Mexico in 1848. This occurred despite Abraham Lincoln’s crystal-clear explanation as a member of Congress that the Adams-Onis Treaty placed the “border dispute” 400 miles within land forever promised to Mexico and forever promised as outside any US claim.

3. The US violated our treaty with Hawaii and stole their country in 1898.

4. The US reneged on promises of freedom after the Spanish American War to impose our rule on the Philippines and install US-friendly dictators in Cuba.

5. The US entered WW1 upon no national security threat to the US and put the 3rd party presidential candidate in prison for public speeches questioning the war.

6. The CIA had several covert wars; perhaps most important in today’s context of war on Iran: “Operation Ajax” that overthrew Iran’s democracy and installed a US-friendly and brutal dictator.  When that dictator was overthrown and Iran refused another, the US aided Iraq to unlawfully invade and attack Iran from 1980-1988; killing up to a million Iranians. If the US lied and acted twice to unlawfully overthrow Iran’s democracy within our own lifetimes, shouldn’t we assume first another lie-started unlawful war today? Upon confirmation of the lies (documented below), shouldn’t we arrest the US War Criminals rather than allow them to kill again?!?

7. The Vietnam War occurred after the US allowed the cancellation of an election to unify the country, as escalated with the Gulf of Tonkin incident: false intelligence at best, but then manipulated into a false-flag event for a “defensive” war.

8. Perhaps most disturbing is the King Family civil suit that found the US government guilty in the assassination of Dr. King. Corporate media, including our text publishers, omit this history. The King family’s conclusion is that Martin was assassinated to prevent his “Occupy DC” plan beginning for the sumer of 1968 to end his version of today’s wars.

9. We now know from Congressional reports that all “reasons” for war with Iraq were known to be false as they were told.

10. The two “reasons” for war with Iran are as false as the “reasons” for war with Iraq. Beware a false flag attack by the US or Israel to blame on Iran as pretext for another “defensive” war:

1. Iran’s president never physically threatened Israel.
2. All of Iran’s nuclear material is fully accounted for peaceful and legal use for energy and medicine.

Also check out our related articles:

Central Banks Are Target Theme of Western Forces

92% of Afghans Never Heard of 9/11

Aghan Opium Trade Flourishes Under U.S. Occupation

A Few Interesting Facts About Libya





Tweet

Black Friday

Why Shouldn't You Shop on Black Friday?



Tweet

Weather Modification Is No Conspiracy Theory

Like Agenda 21, weather modification is no conspiracy theory. Often times when subjects like this are brought up, the average person will simply roll their eyes and tune out their attention, ignoring whatever one might have to say about the subject. It's almost as if certain trigger words will shut down the brain process of the average schmuck on the street. While they are calling the so-called conspiracy theorist a wacko, the sheeple are actually practicing willful ignorance. Many things like this are no hare-brained conspiracy theory, these are the facts of the world we live in. Weather modification is real, and it has been around since at least the 1960's.

Although there is plenty of material on the subject, most people still believe this is the stuff of science-fiction rather than science. In reality, the United States Air Force pioneered some of the first efforts at weather modification, and likely continues to do so today under a greater cloak of secrecy. On the other hand, less secretive corporate interests have also pursued this technology.

Check out this company, for example.


Weather Modification Inc.

Who We Are

Weather Modification, Inc., is a global atmospheric sciences company committed to continued advances in the field of weather modification. Whether it’s identifying the potential benefits of cloud seeding or monitoring air quality, we are dedicated to providing sound, scientific atmospheric solutions.

Nearly 50 Years of Expertise in Atmospheric Sciences

Weather Modification Inc., was founded in 1961, in the small town of Bowman, ND. Bowman is located in an area of the state where the average rainfall is near desert amounts and hail is common. In order to preserve the livelihood of the agricultural community, two pilots/farmers decided to enter the forefront of weather modification.

Our tradition of leadership and innovation continues to direct our future. What started as two aircraft and two pilots has grown to nearly 40 aircraft and more than 80 team members. We continue to expand our services and products to meet emerging client needs. Over the last fifteen years, WMI has broadened its service offerings to include environmental monitoring and expanded atmospheric assessment and evaluation.

Core values of quality, reliability, and innovation provide the framework for Weather Modification, Inc., These values, and our ever-changing planet, will continue to direct our team of scientists, meteorologists, electronics technicians, pilots, and maintenance engineers.

Perhaps the most public display of modern-day weather modification came from China during the Beijing Olympics.

BEIJING — As they prepare to host the Olympics — an event whose very purpose is to push the limits of human beings — the Chinese are trying to do what man never has: Control the weather.

With five months to go before the Summer Games come to Beijing, Chinese scientists say they are confident they can keep rain away from the opening ceremony, or summon a storm on cue to clear the city's choking pollution.

It's a bold — and, according to international scientists, dubious — bit of stage managing, even for a nation that has already shown an outsize ambition to use the Olympics to showcase its development from rural poverty to economic powerhouse.

China is spending $40 billion to remake the infrastructure of the ancient capital, and it already spends an estimated $100 million a year and employs 50,000 for rainmaking.

Click for full story

Now from these facts, we can go ahead and contemplate more theoretical implications of what is going on. Everything from HAARP (video link), to atmospheric conditioning through chem-trails seem to have some merit, but simmer in the more murky waters of conspiracy-theory. Yet it does stand to reason that the frontier of this technology exists beyond what is public knowledge today. Many of these theories, even if not proven, are indeed plausible.

Now, this is not to say that I buy into all these conspiracy theories entirely either. I just think we have to consider some possibilities here.

In my own experience, for example, I can remember that when I was a kid overcast days were pretty rare. And even on days that were overcast, that ceiling seemed lower, less upper-atmospheric, more likely to wind up with some rain or snow at some point. Today, it seems like more days than not, no matter what season, we have a film of overcast that can last for days. Not quite sunny, not quite cloudy. It takes on a slight rusty pollution hue too, and then maybe squeezes out a few sprinkles of rain, rather than an actual shower. Almost as if the atmosphere itself is sweating, rather than passing along a refreshing shower. And then everything on the ground is coated in a strange "grease."

I first noticed it on my car windshield. No matter what I cleaned it with, there was this greasy film on the glass that would just not go away, and was worst after one of these sprinkling rain events when the atmosphere was heavy and stifling.

Meh, anyway, just a few personal observations. It just feels like something is not quite right in the air, in the water. how I breathe, what the sky looks like. Things people might not regularly pay attention to in the modern day with their busy lives.

Like I said, I don't buy into every theory that comes down the pike, and I am not exactly sure what might be happening, but something is different, and it doesn't feel right. Natural climate change? Human pollution without any real agenda? Perhaps. But we should consider all of the evidence just the same.

Hurricane Sandy Planned in 1997, Documents Prove








Tweet